5 Things That Piss Girls Off at a Bar - (And How to Make Sure You Don’t Do Them!)
Sex & Dating Advice - What you did wrong that night:
Wonder why the girl walked away from you? Couldn’t seal the deal and take her home? Maybe you’re committing some of the small simple gestures that just piss girls off.
Definite NO NO’s in a bar:
1. Look at each other the whole night but never approach
A girl across the bar catches your eye and the two of you make eye contact. She’s cute, and just what your looking for tonight. Every time you walk by she seems to be looking at you as well, but you just can’t seem to find the nerve to approach her. Happened to you before? Well, sounds like you definitely lost a good opportunity. The fact that you two are making eye contact is a pretty good indication that A.) she’s checking you out and B.) she’s just waiting for you to make the first move. Most girls are traditional and like the idea of guys making the first move. Leaving without even making an attempt to talk to her gives her nothing to remember you by, and may even make her little irritated. So if you really want the girl, stop looking and start approaching.
2. Talk to her all night all but never buy her a drink
Girls basically expect guys to buy them drinks at bars. Sorry but this is the truth. They want to be wined and dined and taken care off. So if you’ve met a girl that you’re interested in, a good way to keep her with/talking to you and allow her to loosen up more is to buy her a drink. Talking to her all night and not even making an attempt to buy her a drink makes you look inattentive. And let’s be honest, a little more alcohol can always help ease the situation a bit further.
3. Try and dance with her when she’s on the dance floor
A girl may look damn sexy on the dance floor, but in no way is that an invitation for you to come tango with her. As soon as you try this move guaranteed she’s going to place you under the category of sketchy. So be a gentleman and ask the lady to dance. Then show her how you can really work it out there.
4. Be clingy
Just because you met the girl first doesn’t mean she’s your property. A girl needs her space. Plus, she most likely went to the bar with some friends and wants to hang out with those people too. So after you’ve made a “connection,†let her mingle; then draw her in later. This allows her to observe you for awhile and let her realize that you could actually “be a good guy.†Make sure your initial conversation is enough to “whet her appetite†and have her wanting to come back for more.
5. Hit on her friends while hitting on her
Girls like to travel in packs. But in no way does this mean that they are like a buffet where you can taste a little of each one. Working more than one girl in a group of friends will make you look like a skeez ball and a little too hungry for action. Be charming to the friends (because many times they will share in the vote on whether she’ll go home with you later on that night), but keep your attention on the girl you want.
The Reward:
These mistakes may all seem too simple, but believe me; guys do them all the time. Don’t let these mistakes get in the way of what could potentially be a good hook up. Do us girls a favor and stop pissing us off, and maybe we’ll actually reward you for it later on.
Related stuff:
- Act Like You Can Dance Nothing scares me more than hearing the words, “Dance Party.†Just two simple, innocuous words, yet when placed together they are powerful enough to make...
- Shit We Did This Week Cristina told guys what we did wrong: 5 Things that Piss Girls Off in Bars. Interviewed the guys at FOUR to see Who's Making Your Booze. Funneled a few from our new pimp...
- First Hookup: Drunk or Sober? You’ve all experienced it. The dreaded morning-after. You wake up to find yourself in complete disarray, with the whole room reeking of potent perfume, cigarette smoke...
What in the world?
Why would a girl expect us to buy them drinks? This is as foolish as it gets.
Nice guys buy girls drinks, and then get blown off by said girl.
Foucus: Your 5 things pre-date feminism.
feminism was a plague on mankind. chivalry lives, deal with it
Ouch! That girl pretty much said it all!
Sorry about that misspelling.
What I am really trying to say, when I walk out of the bar and around the corner, your trampy sister is giving a much better deal, and its guaranteed.
You ladies need to drop all of these expectations. Think it has anything to do with why there are more single women then ever? YOUR NOT WORTH IT!
and that, my friend, is why i am not dating you
Why are you trying to hurt my feelings?
Do you really want to hurt me? Do you really want to make me cry?
You are not dating me because dating is for suckers! Everybody knows you can go out and bang out a bar girl any night you want(just like the ones mentioned here). Dating is for guys who do not know how to get laid, and for girls that feel like a free meal and a power trip.
The game is up and the marriage strike is on! Who wants to marry a girl thats been banging azzwholes for the last 10 years? As men we have choices, more men are coming to realize this.
Good luck ladies finding that Nice Guy to marry! LOL …
I think this article is talking about hooking up.
You guys are talking about marriage and shit!
Whoa!
dating/marriage (marriage? what? college?) aside, hook up with a classy girl rather than her “trampy sister” and it won’t burn when you pee ;)
[...] Cristina told guys what we did wrong: 5 Things that Piss Girls Off in Bars. [...]
[...] read more | digg story [...]
Things TO do when at the bar: scope a target (or targets), buy her (or them)copious amounts of panty-dropping Jager-bombs, scam on her friends while her drunk ass is in the can, give her a fake name, get your boyz to separate the pack (bitches will give up none unless you get rid of the other nuns), then when she starts slurring take her to a motel and ass banger until her butt-hole falls out(that way she won’t get pregnant).
Enjoy!!
Wow… your the deffinition of a piece of shit
haha no that’s a definition of a gook, i love it :)
First off, I know me and my crew are def guilty of a few of these, but to be brutally honest I don’t think they’re all that accurate.I’m guilty of number 3, but sometimes girls like the aggressiveness……iono just a thouhght….BTW, to the girl a couple of comments up…CHIVILRY IS DEAD!!! It doesn’t \get a good dude ANYWHERE these days…and im speaking from experience….b/c at the end of then ight, the chick still leaves wit the gook.
merci pur le bisou
I will never buy a girl a drink under any circumstances unless we are already sleeping together. If anything they should buy me a drink. Number two I think the biggest mistake you can make in a bar is pulling it out….just take my word for it. All you gotta do is charm em. Then afterword take them to the crib, put on some hilarious stuff like (http://tinyurl.com/5qdnkr), and then get buisy.
The Poverty of Feminism
I have three main objections to feminism.
1 The political territory which feminism claims to occupy is already covered by classical liberalism. We already have perfectly good theories about human rights and civil rights and political equality, and we just don’t need another one. Under a liberal reading, women are no different from anybody else: there isn’t really any such thing as ‘women’s rights’, any more than ‘left-handed people’s rights’.
2 The intellectual quality of the analysis offered by feminists is desperately poor. Feminists have appropriated the domain of sexual politics for themselves. ‘We are the authority on this matter’, they claim, ‘if you want to know about sexual politics, come to us, and we will tell you what to think. Your opinions are not welcome’. Not only is this a deeply authoritarian attitude, which should arouse our hostility in itself, but having seized power in this area, they have, from society’s point of view, done a spectacularly poor job. Surely the first task of any such organisation would be to produce an analysis, a model of the task domain. Yet not only is feminism’s analysis of sexual relations pathetically inadequate, it is, even worse, dangerously misleading, dogmatic, self-serving and divisive.
3 They are not fulfilling their responsibilities to society. Surely, the role of any organisation which claims to address problems in sexual politics should be, first and foremost, to act as an honest broker. Feminists should be the UN peacekeepers of the sexual landscape, the impartial police who arbitrate in disputes, who identify potential sources of conflict and pour oil on troubled waters. The primary role of any such organisation should surely be to promote harmony, good relations and communication between the sexes. Yet feminists do precisely the opposite. Far from impartial, they act only in their own narrow interests, they regard men as an enemy to be defeated, they stir up hatred and moral panic at every opportunity. They are not police but vigilantes.
Forever married to the outdated Marxist and Psychoanalytic dogmas of the late 1960s, their analysis of issues can never improve. The 1960s counter-culture produced an outlook on life which is deeply anti-social and maladjusted to say the least.
The society in which we grew up, the safest, wealthiest, healthiest and most liberal society in history, is regarded as the root of all evil in the world. The whole society in which we live, our own culture, must be completely razed to the ground. Only then can we rebuild a New Jerusalem from the ashes. To say that this is an irrational belief is putting it mildly. Revolutionary politics is misleading and pessimistic, because it teaches us that social reform is impossible. We cannot change anything unless we change everything. Yet that is the political outlook, derived from the most unsavoury role models, Marx, Lenin and Mao, that the hippies of the 1960s adopted.
Feminism is the Western world’s last surviving bastion of that totalitarian thinking. Feminists have concentrated their efforts on attacking marriage, the family, heterosexuality and men in general. The fact that they think women’s interests will be served by this indicates just how deeply deluded they are.
Coupled with this destructive and irrational hatred of one’s own culture was a peculiar narcissism. Experimentation with ‘alternative lifestyles’ was probably inevitable once a sufficiently wealthy and liberal society appeared. The data is now in, and the results are deeply unedifying. What the 1968 generation – the last surviving remnant of which is the feminist movement - gave us was widespread social collapse. Divorce, fatherlessness, family breakdown, abortion, crime, drug abuse, child neglect, sexually transmitted infections, personal heartbreak, educational failure. Single-parent households living off public funds, leading to an increase in traffic, pollution, housing shortage, taxation and the intrusive power of the State.
The feminist movement has served the short-term selfish interests of middle-class white women, but its effects on the wider society have been catastrophic. They are under the delusion that they are trying to save a misguided world from its own folly. The arrogance of this position is stunning.
There are several reasons why feminist theory is so intellectually bankrupt. One cause is an inherent left-wing distrust of the establishment. Any theorizing done by the male establishment must be rejected. Thus, science and logic cannot be pursued in any honest way. Aspects of mainstream science and philosophy will be appropriated (and then arbitrarily dropped) if they happen to suit short-term political convenience, but that is all.
The second factor is that women are very socially-focused creatures. I know from my own experience that men will discuss science, economics, history and philosophy, but women only ever talk about themselves and other people. They find men’s conversation on these subjects boring and geeky. They concern themselves with the minutiae of personal relationships, almost to the exclusion of all else. This tends to militate against any kind of large-scale theorizing, which the feminist project requires.
A second outcome from this preoccupation with social issues is a desire to fit in and be accepted. This tends to mean that women will latch onto any passing fad or trend. Most of the feminists I have known in my life are interested in every kind of mysticism from astrology to reiki to homeopathy. It’s easier and more fun than reading evolutionary psychology. With a lack of intellectual rigour and a desire to be trendy and popular, every kind of nonsense is actively embraced. This tends to make for very poor theory. Post-modernism comes to the rescue by claiming that every theory is just as good as every other, a notion as intellectually bankrupt as it is possible to get.
Thirdly, there is the dogmatic moral arrogance of feminism. Anyone who dares to ask questions is pilloried as a misogynist. This is a deliberate tactic used to suppress debate and silence criticism. Naomi Wolf recommends that dissenters should be subjected to female psycho-social violence around the middle-class dinner table. At every social gathering, the unfortunate victim will be subjected to scorn, filthy looks and verbal abuse until they cave in and stop disagreeing with feminists. This is an openly totalitarian mindset. It is the middle-class equivalent of the Spanish Inquisition. This behaviour can have real and very severe consequences, including the breakup of relationships and damage to people’s mental health. For some reason, feminists seem to think that they are immune from scrutiny or criticism. Such attitudes simply cannot be accepted in a democracy.
Lastly, feminism is a modern-day religion, and its adherents act like any other religious believers. They dare not question the Holy Writ for fear of excommunication. They hold established religious ideas in sacred reverence. Anyone who does not do so is a heretic or an infidel. They create cults of personality around significant past leaders, whose wisdom cannot be questioned. This religious mindset is anathema to free intellectual enquiry, which, again, makes for very poor theory. Once a bad idea has become established, it is very difficult to displace it.
Feminists are not fulfilling their responsibilities towards the wider society because they simply do not believe that they have any; they believe only that society has responsibilities towards them. I don’t have to do anything, I’m already perfect. It is a cult mindset which strokes the ego of insecure and dysfunctional women.
It is long past the time when this bizarre cult must be openly challenged.